logo Netzschleuder network catalog, repository, and centrifuge

packet_delays — Internet packet delays (2002)

Description

Measurements of the difference in delay experienced by packet probes sent over the Internet, from an experiment conducted by M. Coates and collaborators during a short period in 2001, from a desktop computer in the ECE department at Rice University to similar machines at ten university locations. The data were collected to test a method for inferring the topology of the Internet routing tree from end-to-end measurements, and are distributed with the book "Statistical Analysis of Network Data" by E. D. Kolaczyk.

Each probe consisted of two small packets, separated by one large packet: both small packets were sent to the same destination, while the large packet was sent to a different (or the same) destination. The difference in delay between the two small packets, caused by the large packet queueing in front of the second small packet, indicates how much of the path the two destinations share.

Nodes are the ten destination hosts: 1 = Instituto Superior Técnico (Portugal), 2 = Instituto de Telecomunicações (Portugal), 3 = University of California, Berkeley, 4 and 5 = Michigan State University (hosts 1 and 2), 6 = University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign, 7 and 8 = University of Wisconsin, Madison (hosts 1 and 2), 9 and 10 = Rice University (hosts 1 and 2). Each probe is a directed edge from the destination of the small packets to the destination of the large packet, so the network is a multigraph with self-loops, where each ordered pair of destinations is connected by between 57 and 125 edges.

The network has the following properties:

  • (Node) name: the destination number, from 1 to 10.
  • (Edge) delay: the difference in delay of the two small packets of the probe, in milliseconds (as stated in the source documentation).
Tags
Technological Communication Weighted
Added
2020-08-12
Citation
  • M. Coates et al., "Maximum likelihood network topology identification from edge-based unicast measurements." ACM SIGMETRICS Performance Evaluation Review 30(1), 11-20 (2002) 10.1145/511399.511337 Sci-Hub
Upstream URL OK
http://math.bu.edu/people/kolaczyk/datasets.html
Networks
Tip: hover over a column header for a description.
Column legend
$\left<k\right>$
Mean degree
$\sigma_k$
Standard deviation of the degrees
$\lambda_h$
Largest eigenvalue of the Hashimoto (non-backtracking) matrix
$\tau$
Random walk mixing time
$r$
Degree assortativity
$c$
Global clustering coefficient
$\oslash$
(Pseudo-) diameter
$S$
Relative size of the largest component
NPs
Node properties
EPs
Edge properties
Name Nodes Edges $\left<k\right>$ $\sigma_k$ $\lambda_h$ $\tau$ $r$ $c$ $\oslash$ $S$ Kind Mode NPs EPs gt GraphML GML csv
packet_delays 10 9,567 956.70 124.82 10.00 0.29 0.02 0.89 1 1.00 Directed Unipartite name delay 23 KiB 40 KiB 39 KiB 28 KiB
Ridiculograms*
* These are automatically generated force-directed visualizations, and can be quite meaningless for networks both big and small. They should not be taken seriously as sources of scientific insight. See here for a discussion.