logo Netzschleuder network catalog, repository, and centrifuge

pokec — Pokec online social network (2012)

Description

Friendship network of Pokec, the most popular online social network in Slovakia, which had been operating for more than 10 years and connected more than 1.6 million people when the data were collected by L. Takac and M. Zabovsky (published in 2012). The data are anonymized and cover the whole network. Nodes are users, and a directed edge $(i,j)$ indicates that user $i$ lists user $j$ as a friend; friendships in Pokec are oriented (not necessarily reciprocated). The user IDs of the source data run from 1 to 1,632,803; the node with index $i$ corresponds to the user with ID $i+1$. The data were obtained from the Stanford Network Analysis Project (SNAP).

The source data also include user profiles (in Slovak), with information such as gender, age, region, hobbies, interests and education, but these are not included in this network.

Tags
Social Online Unweighted
Citation
  • L. Takac and M. Zabovsky. "Data Analysis in Public Social Networks." Internat. Sci. Conf. & Internat. Workshop Present Day Trends of Innovations, Lomza, Poland (2012). snap.stanford.edu
Upstream URL OK
http://snap.stanford.edu/data/soc-pokec.html
Networks
Tip: hover over a column header for a description.
Column legend
$\left<k\right>$
Mean degree
$\sigma_k$
Standard deviation of the degrees
$\lambda_h$
Largest eigenvalue of the Hashimoto (non-backtracking) matrix
$\tau$
Random walk mixing time
$r$
Degree assortativity
$c$
Global clustering coefficient
$\oslash$
(Pseudo-) diameter
$S$
Relative size of the largest component
NPs
Node properties
EPs
Edge properties
Name Nodes Edges $\left<k\right>$ $\sigma_k$ $\lambda_h$ $\tau$ $r$ $c$ $\oslash$ $S$ Kind Mode NPs EPs gt GraphML GML csv
pokec 1,632,804 30,622,564 18.75 59.53 129.12 1014.17 0.00 0.06 14 1.00 Directed Unipartite 102.3 MiB 155.8 MiB 148.6 MiB 144.1 MiB
Ridiculograms*
* These are automatically generated force-directed visualizations, and can be quite meaningless for networks both big and small. They should not be taken seriously as sources of scientific insight. See here for a discussion.