logo Netzschleuder network catalog, repository, and centrifuge

arxiv_collab — Scientific collaborations in physics (1995-2005)

Description

Weighted co-authorship networks of scientists who posted preprints on the arXiv e-print repository, compiled by M. E. J. Newman. Nodes are authors, identified by their surname and initials, and an undirected edge connects two authors if they co-authored at least one preprint. There is one network for each of three arXiv archives over the period 1995–1999 (astro-ph-1999: astrophysics; cond-mat-1999: condensed matter physics; hep-th-1999: high energy physics, theory), and two updated versions of the condensed matter network, covering preprints posted between January 1, 1995 and June 30, 2003 (cond-mat-2003) and between January 1, 1995 and March 31, 2005 (cond-mat-2005).

Edge weights account for the fact that authors of papers with many co-authors know each other less well on average: each paper $k$ with $n_k$ authors contributes $1/(n_k-1)$ to the weight of the edge between each pair of its authors, so that $w_{ij} = \sum_k \delta_i^k\delta_j^k/(n_k-1)$, where $\delta_i^k=1$ if $i$ is an author of paper $k$ and $0$ otherwise. Papers with a single author do not contribute. Since authors are identified by surname and initials, different people with the same surname and initials may be merged into a single node, and the same person may appear under different names.

The networks have the following properties:

  • (Node) label: the author's name ("SURNAME, INITIALS").
  • (Edge) value: the collaboration weight $w_{ij}$ described above.
Tags
Social Collaboration Weighted Projection
Added
2020-08-11
Citation
  • M. E. J. Newman, "The structure of scientific collaboration networks." Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 98(2), 404-409 (2001). arxiv:cond-mat/0007214 10.1073/pnas.98.2.404 Sci-Hub
Upstream URL OK
http://www-personal.umich.edu/~mejn/netdata/
Networks
Tip: click on a column header to sort the list, or hover over it for a description.
Column legend
$\left<k\right>$
Mean degree
$\sigma_k$
Standard deviation of the degrees
$\lambda_h$
Largest eigenvalue of the Hashimoto (non-backtracking) matrix
$\tau$
Random walk mixing time
$r$
Degree assortativity
$c$
Global clustering coefficient
$\oslash$
(Pseudo-) diameter
$S$
Relative size of the largest component
NPs
Node properties
EPs
Edge properties
Name Nodes Edges $\left<k\right>$ $\sigma_k$ $\lambda_h$ $\tau$ $r$ $c$ $\oslash$ $S$ Kind Mode NPs EPs gt GraphML GML csv
cond-mat-1999 16,726 47,594 5.69 6.42 23.14 138.86 0.18 0.36 18 0.83 Undirected Unipartite label value 457 KiB 703 KiB 691 KiB 569 KiB
cond-mat-2003 31,163 120,029 7.70 10.40 38.30 233.87 0.18 0.28 16 0.88 Undirected Unipartite label value 887 KiB 1.4 MiB 1.4 MiB 1.2 MiB
cond-mat-2005 40,421 175,692 8.69 12.73 49.17 232.91 0.19 0.25 18 0.90 Undirected Unipartite label value 1.2 MiB 2.0 MiB 2.0 MiB 1.6 MiB
astro-ph-1999 16,706 121,251 14.52 21.01 72.21 304.20 0.24 0.43 14 0.89 Undirected Unipartite label value 560 KiB 1.0 MiB 1008 KiB 839 KiB
hep-th-1999 8,361 15,751 3.77 4.31 22.00 178.64 0.29 0.33 19 0.70 Undirected Unipartite label value 218 KiB 320 KiB 313 KiB 256 KiB
Ridiculograms*
* These are automatically generated force-directed visualizations, and can be quite meaningless for networks both big and small. They should not be taken seriously as sources of scientific insight. See here for a discussion.