logo Netzschleuder network catalog, repository, and centrifuge

psi — Plant Photosystem I excitation energy transfer network (2020)

Description

Weighted directed network of the light-harvesting Photosystem Ι (PSI) of the plant Pisum sativum. The nodes represent chromophores with different identities (i.e. chlorophyll a, chlorophyll b, β-carotene and derivates, lutein, violaxanthin), while edges represent FRET transfer between chromophores. The link directionality connecting nodes in the PSI network depends on the energy levels of the connected chromophores. The weights correspond to the FRET Efficiency between connected chromophores. Hence a directed edge $(i,j)$ represents the transfer of excitation energy from chromophore $i$ to chromophore $j$, presumably from donor to acceptor (the direction convention of the data file is not documented), weighted by the efficiency of this transfer; most pairs of chromophores (about 80% of the edges) are connected in both directions, with different efficiencies.

Tags
Biological Weighted
Added
2023-02-19
Citation
  • Montepietra D., Bellingeri M., Ross A.M., Scotognella F. and Cassi D., "Modelling photosystem I as a complex interacting network", J. R. Soc. Interface (2020) 10.1098/rsif.2020.0813 Sci-Hub
Upstream URL OK
https://networks.skewed.de/net/psi
Networks
Tip: hover over a column header for a description.
Column legend
$\left<k\right>$
Mean degree
$\sigma_k$
Standard deviation of the degrees
$\lambda_h$
Largest eigenvalue of the Hashimoto (non-backtracking) matrix
$\tau$
Random walk mixing time
$r$
Degree assortativity
$c$
Global clustering coefficient
$\oslash$
(Pseudo-) diameter
$S$
Relative size of the largest component
NPs
Node properties
EPs
Edge properties
Name Nodes Edges $\left<k\right>$ $\sigma_k$ $\lambda_h$ $\tau$ $r$ $c$ $\oslash$ $S$ Kind Mode NPs EPs gt GraphML GML csv
psi 192 29,390 153.07 73.83 184.29 0.27 -0.09 0.99 2 1.00 Directed Unipartite weight 177 KiB 290 KiB 283 KiB 309 KiB
Ridiculograms*
* These are automatically generated force-directed visualizations, and can be quite meaningless for networks both big and small. They should not be taken seriously as sources of scientific insight. See here for a discussion.